![]() Sixteen different tools were compared: CADIMA, Covidence, Distiller SR, Endnote, Endnote using Bramer's method, EPPI-Reviewer, EROS, HAWC, Microsoft Excel, Excel using VonVille's method, Microsoft Word, Rayyan, RevMan, SyRF,, and SWIFT Active Screener. ![]() This analysis enables researchers to select the tool that is most appropriate for their needs. Therefore, a feature analysis was performed to compare different reference screening tools as objectively as possible. However, it is not always clear which features each tool offers. Fortunately, several software tools are available that make screening faster and easier. Unfortunately, SRs can be labor- and time-intensive, especially the reference screening and data extraction phases. Abstract : Systematic reviews (SRs) hold promise for implementing the 3Rs in animal sciences: they can retrieve available alternative models, help refine experiments, and identify insufficiencies in, or an excess of, scientific knowledge on a particular topic.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |